by Jason Joyner | Apr 18, 2011 | Blog, CSFF, speculative fiction, suspense, There's a Strange Man on my book cover
April – the month that should herald in spring. In Idaho it is ushering in strange weather. Well, not really – our weather usually stinks this time of year. But it is also the month to introduce The Strange Man to you, courtesy of new author Greg Mitchell and the Christian Sci-fi and Fantasy tour.
We’re in the midst of a supernatural suspense kick. Last month we featured Mike Duran and his book The Resurrection. In June we have Darkness Follows by Mike Dellosso. We’ve done runs of fantasy, blocks of YA speculative fiction. If you’re in the mood for a supernatural scare, then we are the place to be.
The Strange Man is Greg’s debut novel. It has a haunting cover and an interesting premise.
The town of Greensboro is a typical town that is struggling with new highways and more interesting things to do in its neighbors. The people are holding on to what they’ve had in the past, except for their faith. That seems to be slipping away, and someone is noticing this.
Dras Weldon is your typical adult adolescent, not willing to grow up and out of his world of comic books, action figures, and B horror movies. The fact that his childhood best friend Rosalyn is looking to actually move on from Greensboro isn’t helping. He is tired of hearing criticism from his older brother, the pastor, as well.
When The Strange Man decides the time is ripe for Greensboro’s harvest, Dras is an unlikely combatant. He doesn’t have anything to fight with, unless he can reconnect with his withered faith in time.
Below you’ll find what our other tourmates are saying. Tomorrow I’ll be reviewing The Strange Man, and Wednesday I’m planning to talk about an interesting character in the book – unless the tour surprises me with something else. It has before!
Noah Arsenault
Red Bissell
Kathy Brasby
Grace Bridges
Beckie Burnham
CSFF Blog Tour
Amber French
Tori Greene
Katie Hart
Bruce Hennigan
Timothy Hicks
Carol Keen
Inae Kyo
Emily LaVigne
Shannon McDermott
Matt Mikalatos
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Gavin Patchett
Andrea Schultz
Kathleen Smith
Donna Swanson
Jessica Thomas
Steve Trower
Fred Warren
Dona Watson
Phyllis Wheeler
—
by Jason Joyner | Apr 12, 2011 | Blog, Christianity, faith, verbal boxing
Ready for round 2?
Yesterday I posted about the discussion surrounding Rob Bell and his latest book Love Wins. (Not about the book itself, if that’s what you’re looking for – but stick around anyway!) In watching the discussion online, I noticed an accusation that was disconcerting. Many people questioned whether there was heresy or an admission of universalism in the book. That wasn’t my issue. My concern came when some commenters started hitting back accusing critics of placing more importance on doctrine over love and relationship.
My previous point was the repetitive admonishment in the books of 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus over teaching sound doctrine. Paul stressed that over and over again in those books, so I don’t think it is out of line for people to actually question whether there are doctrinal problems in any author’s work.
I had another point though, the subject of today’s post. Again, I go to the pastoral letters for support.
|
| “Did not!” “Did so!” |
Paul repeats another theme for Timothy and Titus: avoid quarrelsome speech (Titus 3:2, 1 Tim 3:3, 2 Tim 2:14, 24). This idea is suggested several times, also in the form of controversies, dissensions, or myths.
I’ve seen this in many arenas, from Christians fighting amongst themselves to politicians tearing each other down. This has frustrated me for a long time. A person can spout fully orthodox positions, be clearly speaking God’s word, but they do it in such an ugly manner that it totally demeans the very point they’re trying to make.
People on both sides of the Rob Bell debate have been guilty of this. Whether they’re angry, smug, sarcastic, condemning, or just plain nasty or rude, they are violating another key point of the pastoral letters. “And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kindly to everyone, an apt teacher, patient, correcting opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant that they will repent and come to know the truth.” (2 Tim 2:24-25).
How we react in such things is just as important as the what and why! We may be speaking the truth, but if we do it in the wrong spirit, then we are also disobeying the Lord and walking in sin. I’ve been very disturbed to see televangelists or a conservative Christian politician tear down opponents of their positions. That, to me, is not the Spirit of Christ.
Don’t get me wrong. Titus 1:9 tells us that an overseer must “be able both to preach with sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict it.” Mature believers have a responsibility to examine an idea from a book, a teacher, a church, and to see if it matches up with sound doctrine. But the heart of the matter can be lost if it is done in anger or putting someone down.
Romans 12:20-21 says: “’If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.’ Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” OK, so I don’t think this passage should be considered to be calling Rob Bell or his detractors “enemies” or “evil.” The principle is moving in the opposite spirit. Shouldn’t Christians be able to speak with grace and gentleness, especially with issues involving other Christians?
I’ve really enjoyed studying the letters of 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus lately. I’ve had to step up into a new leadership position at my church, so I figured Paul’s advice here would be valuable. The dual emphasis on teaching sound doctrine but doing so without quarreling/with gentleness in these letters has been a poignant reminder in what I’ve been reading online lately. My hope for anyone reading these two posts is that they continue to seek the truth, but speak it in love.
—
by Jason Joyner | Apr 12, 2011 | Blog, Christianity, faith, verbal boxing
Ready for round 2?
Yesterday I posted about the discussion surrounding Rob Bell and his latest book Love Wins. (Not about the book itself, if that’s what you’re looking for – but stick around anyway!) In watching the discussion online, I noticed an accusation that was disconcerting. Many people questioned whether there was heresy or an admission of universalism in the book. That wasn’t my issue. My concern came when some commenters started hitting back accusing critics of placing more importance on doctrine over love and relationship.
My previous point was the repetitive admonishment in the books of 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus over teaching sound doctrine. Paul stressed that over and over again in those books, so I don’t think it is out of line for people to actually question whether there are doctrinal problems in any author’s work.
I had another point though, the subject of today’s post. Again, I go to the pastoral letters for support.
|
| “Did not!” “Did so!” |
Paul repeats another theme for Timothy and Titus: avoid quarrelsome speech (Titus 3:2, 1 Tim 3:3, 2 Tim 2:14, 24). This idea is suggested several times, also in the form of controversies, dissensions, or myths.
I’ve seen this in many arenas, from Christians fighting amongst themselves to politicians tearing each other down. This has frustrated me for a long time. A person can spout fully orthodox positions, be clearly speaking God’s word, but they do it in such an ugly manner that it totally demeans the very point they’re trying to make.
People on both sides of the Rob Bell debate have been guilty of this. Whether they’re angry, smug, sarcastic, condemning, or just plain nasty or rude, they are violating another key point of the pastoral letters. “And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kindly to everyone, an apt teacher, patient, correcting opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant that they will repent and come to know the truth.” (2 Tim 2:24-25).
How we react in such things is just as important as the what and why! We may be speaking the truth, but if we do it in the wrong spirit, then we are also disobeying the Lord and walking in sin. I’ve been very disturbed to see televangelists or a conservative Christian politician tear down opponents of their positions. That, to me, is not the Spirit of Christ.
Don’t get me wrong. Titus 1:9 tells us that an overseer must “be able both to preach with sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict it.” Mature believers have a responsibility to examine an idea from a book, a teacher, a church, and to see if it matches up with sound doctrine. But the heart of the matter can be lost if it is done in anger or putting someone down.
Romans 12:20-21 says: “’If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.’ Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” OK, so I don’t think this passage should be considered to be calling Rob Bell or his detractors “enemies” or “evil.” The principle is moving in the opposite spirit. Shouldn’t Christians be able to speak with grace and gentleness, especially with issues involving other Christians?
I’ve really enjoyed studying the letters of 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus lately. I’ve had to step up into a new leadership position at my church, so I figured Paul’s advice here would be valuable. The dual emphasis on teaching sound doctrine but doing so without quarreling/with gentleness in these letters has been a poignant reminder in what I’ve been reading online lately. My hope for anyone reading these two posts is that they continue to seek the truth, but speak it in love.
—
by Jason Joyner | Apr 11, 2011 | Blog, Christianity, faith, Titus and Tim
|
| I <3 questions! |
Rob Bell. Universalism. Heresy. Love Wins.
There’s a few words that should hit the search engines! There’s been a lot of discussion in the Christian blogosphere over the last month, and much of it was related to those points above. The discussion has ranged from rancorous to gentle, and has often generated more heat than light.
I’ve been an interested observer during this. I haven’t read the book, I’m not afraid to read it, but I don’t know if I’ll get around to it (as a friend has said before, my “to be read” pile threatens low-flying aircraft). What I have been reading compels me to share a few thoughts.
There’s been a lot of critique over Love Wins, and there’s been backlash over this. People have been critical of those raising objections to some of the theology in the book. At times, it has seemed to be a push-back against the questions. I’ve seen posts on Facebook and Twitter talking about legalism vs. love, as if we are only dealing with a dualism in this. Those who ask questions whether Rob Bell is theologically correct are being likened to the Pharisees. Can’t we reason together without it denigrating one side or the other?
Paul, when writing the pastoral letters to Timothy and Titus, keeps hammering a theme home: the need to teach sound doctrine. When a book of the Bible repeats a subject, it is a clue to us that it is important. When three books do that, even more so. I was amazed reading through these books how often he stresses this to Timothy and Titus. Didn’t these guys spend a lot of time with Paul? Wouldn’t they see how important it was by then?
Obviously it is important to Paul, because there are several mentions of the idea of “sound doctrine/instruction/teaching.” The qualifications of an elder including holding on to the trustworthy message (Titus 1:9). They are to pass the teaching on to reliable people (2 Tim 2:2). If he mentions it this much to two men who stood with Paul to the end, then the idea of sound doctrine is an important idea, even if our post-modern age likes to ask questions without many answers.
I don’t pretend that the Church has God totally figured out. He is so grand and majestic that there is a mystery to Him. As John said, books on end could be written about Jesus and they wouldn’t cover enough about him. (I’m also reminded of the Teacher who says “Of making many books there is no end.”)
Still, we have the Word of God that is reliable and God-breathed. We can know Him, and we can understand principles of right doctrine. Paul admonishes us repeatedly to hold to sound doctrine. It may not be in favor, but I’ll stand there instead of quelling any criticism. We should be able to discuss issues like Love Wins in a way that honors Paul’s teaching fully…
Which is why I’ve got a follow up post tomorrow with more on this point! See you then 😉
—
by Jason Joyner | Apr 11, 2011 | Blog, Christianity, faith, Titus and Tim
|
| I <3 questions! |
Rob Bell. Universalism. Heresy. Love Wins.
There’s a few words that should hit the search engines! There’s been a lot of discussion in the Christian blogosphere over the last month, and much of it was related to those points above. The discussion has ranged from rancorous to gentle, and has often generated more heat than light.
I’ve been an interested observer during this. I haven’t read the book, I’m not afraid to read it, but I don’t know if I’ll get around to it (as a friend has said before, my “to be read” pile threatens low-flying aircraft). What I have been reading compels me to share a few thoughts.
There’s been a lot of critique over Love Wins, and there’s been backlash over this. People have been critical of those raising objections to some of the theology in the book. At times, it has seemed to be a push-back against the questions. I’ve seen posts on Facebook and Twitter talking about legalism vs. love, as if we are only dealing with a dualism in this. Those who ask questions whether Rob Bell is theologically correct are being likened to the Pharisees. Can’t we reason together without it denigrating one side or the other?
Paul, when writing the pastoral letters to Timothy and Titus, keeps hammering a theme home: the need to teach sound doctrine. When a book of the Bible repeats a subject, it is a clue to us that it is important. When three books do that, even more so. I was amazed reading through these books how often he stresses this to Timothy and Titus. Didn’t these guys spend a lot of time with Paul? Wouldn’t they see how important it was by then?
Obviously it is important to Paul, because there are several mentions of the idea of “sound doctrine/instruction/teaching.” The qualifications of an elder including holding on to the trustworthy message (Titus 1:9). They are to pass the teaching on to reliable people (2 Tim 2:2). If he mentions it this much to two men who stood with Paul to the end, then the idea of sound doctrine is an important idea, even if our post-modern age likes to ask questions without many answers.
I don’t pretend that the Church has God totally figured out. He is so grand and majestic that there is a mystery to Him. As John said, books on end could be written about Jesus and they wouldn’t cover enough about him. (I’m also reminded of the Teacher who says “Of making many books there is no end.”)
Still, we have the Word of God that is reliable and God-breathed. We can know Him, and we can understand principles of right doctrine. Paul admonishes us repeatedly to hold to sound doctrine. It may not be in favor, but I’ll stand there instead of quelling any criticism. We should be able to discuss issues like Love Wins in a way that honors Paul’s teaching fully…
Which is why I’ve got a follow up post tomorrow with more on this point! See you then 😉
—
by Jason Joyner | Apr 6, 2011 | Blog, bombs under the sofa, fiction, writing craft
No one likes getting stuck.
 |
| What is my next plot point??? |
<--Especially THAT kind of stuck. But I'm talking about getting stuck in a novel, not knowing how to move forward. I hit a standstill recently for two reasons. First, I found through some critique that I was heading down a path I didn’t want with a character. She was supposed to be nicer than what she was appearing. Also, I hit a plot point that has me a little tripped up.
I struggle getting out of these predicaments. I’m a streaky writer. If I can build up momentum, then I can keep plugging along. If I get thrown off track, then it kills that head of steam, and I have a hard time building it back up.
I know that I need to keep with consistency, to keep at it. It just gets tricky to maneuver in those circumstances. I’ve heard it said if you get stuck to “stick a bomb under the sofa.” I can see where that would be helpful. You just have to be ready to pick up the pieces when it goes off.
I’ll get past this choke point – I have several others. Hopefully I can find better ways to deal with this in the future.
My question to writer friends is: How do you get past being stuck in your WIP?
—
